From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=fail header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139])
	by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE94111F36F
	for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F09351452;
	Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:00:01 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id yojFMeHj0uub; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:00:00 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
	t=1641909596; bh=7gHslwj3Q6elkC5hR6Cbok5sdjvvquno9ACgiY5Lu8E=;
	h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=hOND2HqBITuUqsnh3QDb2rfmGCr4NDWtsBkvczZ62EBWIx1Bd3I7Tcmx9fTf4V1rJ
	 iyMBvkslkZuwlK1/0pYDjtzq9Z50sFrGFxDn8zi80Gb2RjqNLhCJZHLkHbzRa2nuRQ
	 grjpZuf1PhRBcXSvcBVCub/ZpcU+gBNWrUhI2dwzzy5iCk5djhhJKP+nG3mz8+qANG
	 DJ324K0eYQu0rysrc+ZabFTkdXH+MDpPan7cnOL0YUas9O0qdHuPb0qjwkpUSJb0OQ
	 xNtckOOn0r9VvpJYKu4Rhj3ejw4ibZXXnUGJIvtYla2+aH0QeTyiUlbtqvTyF1PG7J
	 6lnfVWQOzyZfA==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 20:59:52 +0700
Message-Id: <CH2WDHRXM58H.3IUT9RHYUF6TM@nix>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Comments for Static Sites without JavaScripts
From: =?utf-8?q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n_Gia_Phong?= <mcsinyx@disroot.org>
To: =?utf-8?q?Ng=C3=B4_Ng=E1=BB=8Dc_=C4=90=E1=BB=A9c_Huy?=
 <huyngo@disroot.org>, <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>
References: <blog/reply@cnx> <20220111131452.2ntqrw5cq3az4q6f@opensuse>
In-Reply-To: <20220111131452.2ntqrw5cq3az4q6f@opensuse>

> Hmm I often see separate feed for comments on some sites (though I can't
> find them now), which is quite annoying to me because these comments are
> separated from the post.  I'm not sure if it's just my feed reader not
> understanding this field, but I guess it's unlikely the case.

Yea not many readers support `wfw:commentRss`, which is the only semantic
way to deliver comments AFAICT, with WFW pepsi for quite a while.
It should not be difficult to add it to your favorite reader though
so it might be worth a shot discussing with its maintainers.

> > Follow the anchor in an author's name to reply
>
> Why not just make a "Reply" link instead?  Is it intentional to be
> unintuitive?

Thank you for the feedback, it was not a concious decision (-;

> Re: deleting comments, I wonder how would you do that.  Do you have to
> manually goes through the comments in mbox and delete it every time you
> regenerate the comments?

lists.sr.ht has moderation features so I'm using them.
If one uses a personal mail box, deleting or moving
inappropriate comments to a separate folder should do.

> Anyway, nice work, I think I might look into implementing something
> similar at some point.

Thanks d-; I'm looking forward to seeing it!

> FWIW, the workaround works:
>
>     neomutt "mailto:..."
>
> It is a bit annoying, though, because for some reason Firefox stripped
> the parameters when I copy it.

Seconded, Firefox does not treat URIs indiscriminately and pretends
that `mailto` is only about the email address )-;  Try *setting*
the following script for `mailto` handling in Firefox:

    #!/bin/sh
    exec urxvt -e neomutt "$@"