From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C833B11EEF9 for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA10546A9 for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:16:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8SMTP id gqQueNnE2YEq for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:16:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 20:14:52 +0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1641906900; bh=giMvfmPel6g0C9BqCuCknJ6jFLtRvsAyhn5Q8IFbNqc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=a4dPXi5xqDkE+E9aGWEJAkae/u1MnGEqP0ElFv6MlENtlJ+o+OiYyfbxnEFOFNmya Vg/IZcdjx9yfYstQXEzxWtlSWU5lIs+/RARjd7ltq9ERiuVgHgKd/9n8FtIst2iKys qhVcHmW+ApahPKUe1soWXh1YIbyW0mlLFVrpPAoBO7QpyAd4F8Re6DwirBSbiiIRrS 3XUkD64GuuCjAfc7ymeAkfjqf7y8mqzkFuo/hEbLhBPBfWufqLXChzWILIDzrEfEi8 OI2xzR1kVDUr6o/TA5ssN3BQ1M3cBnppWpwHOs4WvMw5GMWquDQ9wHHRW+n6A9+/o5 C4yW82V91x4AQ== From: =?utf-8?B?TmfDtCBOZ+G7jWMgxJDhu6lj?= Huy To: ~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: Comments for Static Sites without JavaScripts Message-ID: <20220111131452.2ntqrw5cq3az4q6f@opensuse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Hmm I often see separate feed for comments on some sites (though I can't find them now), which is quite annoying to me because these comments are separated from the post. I'm not sure if it's just my feed reader not understanding this field, but I guess it's unlikely the case. > Follow the anchor in an author's name to reply Why not just make a "Reply" link instead? Is it intentional to be unintuitive? Re: deleting comments, I wonder how would you do that. Do you have to manually goes through the comments in mbox and delete it every time you regenerate the comments? Anyway, nice work, I think I might look into implementing something similar at some point. > FYI this email sets Reply-To instead of In-Reply-To so it won't show up > on the site. I've drafted the reply for this, could you please resend > the comment with the corrected header? FWIW, the workaround works: neomut "mailto:..." It is a bit annoying, though, because for some reason Firefox stripped the parameters when I copy it. Another way that works for neomutt is to use "edit header" (hot key: E). ↑ Note for future me