From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAED811EEDD for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB5551539 for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:18:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8SMTP id IrxzS0nJzJ-T for <~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:18:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:17:57 +0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1641827885; bh=PkQFmU+EcvCBjZxyVZF0Mx/PwZfsNeojaPkR/eGuQPw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To; b=TZy9c7yXcMefxE80IqJRjAwWNguV/Utav8596AdBbHWpCIk5e9GxhrpWD+XLjVp16 djImk9jxHo52Q5JxxCWiMpYvSfxjlsBokcZlfRud0HE3PKQxaUvc0uFrJkl4bnKzQZ iXGhJMf94B29IVjebgXwqowvrURlzgxp+Ubb/CS1ihYMu0RrwO0Hdub8azsBjK6iGA tGSP9i+/EAYVk9fRYWllU2JGIkNbJ4OzLEATj5AHt5t0/PpnOTePSu+WtehlTPtKt9 1g7qmKf/BfESJG48iGC4BEjW4H4ifwwNSBX9k7xYNOeSRSZBbMV6tgfr9vgWUM26r6 YOAPlot1ZS6mQ== From: =?utf-8?B?TmfDtCBOZ+G7jWMgxJDhu6lj?= Huy To: ~cnx/site@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: Comments for Static Sites without JavaScripts Message-ID: <20220110151757.5hvldm32pyvq3z3l@opensuse> Reply-To: blog/reply@cnx Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Hmm I often see separate feed for comments on some sites (though I can't find them now), which is quite annoying to me because these comments are separated from the post. I'm not sure if it's just my feed reader not understanding this field, but I guess it's unlikely the case. > Follow the anchor in an author's name to reply Why not just make a "Reply" link instead? Is it intentional to be unintuitive? Re: deleting comments, I wonder how would you do that. Do you have to manually goes through the comments in mbox and delete it every time you regenerate the comments? Anyway, nice work, I think I might look into implementing something similar at some point.